<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Freedom of the Prez</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/default.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://spj.org/images/blogheads/presidentbloghead.gif" border=0 width=835 height=165&gt;</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60217.2664)</generator><item><title>Looking forward to the sunshine in he Sunshine state</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/11/07/21627.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21627</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21627.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21627</wfw:commentRss><description>The latest travel venture for this SPJ president is a trip to Florida Saturday night to speak to the Reporter's Institute, which is meeting at the Poynter Insititute in St. Petersburg. 
I am looking forward to meeting what appears to be a great group of journalists from across the country set to get three days of training. I will be making a few remarks over lunch Monday about the state of the industry. Believe it or not, I found some bright spots while prepearing for my talk. 
The number of people...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/11/07/21627.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21627" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Standing up for the LA Times</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/10/30/21608.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21608</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21608.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21608</wfw:commentRss><description>The Los Angeles Times has been&amp;nbsp;catching flack from Senator McCain and his supporters because it refuses to release a&amp;nbsp;video of Senator Obama at a party&amp;nbsp;for Rashid Khalidi, an Israeli critic among other things. The Times did an&amp;nbsp;extensive piece in April on the relationship. It &amp;nbsp;based the story&amp;nbsp;on a video but did not put&amp;nbsp;it on its web site because its source made it a condition of getting the video.
The Times is doing the right thing. A promise to a source must be...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/10/30/21608.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21608" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>A few words about alleged media bias</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/10/27/21598.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21598</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21598.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21598</wfw:commentRss><description>Much is being made of a recent Pew-led&amp;nbsp;study Project for Journalism&amp;nbsp;Excellence&amp;nbsp;on how much negative coverage the presidential candidates get. According to the report, John McCain is getting more negative coverage than Barack Obama in the most recent reporting period. 
Partisans are using it as clear evidence of reporters slanting their coverage to elect Obama. I say not so fast. If you read deeper into the report, you find that much of the so called&amp;nbsp;"negative" coverage is driven...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/10/27/21598.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21598" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fort Worth's newest member</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/10/19/21577.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21577</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21577.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21577</wfw:commentRss><description>Traditions are important in life and in organziations such as SPJ. With the 100th anniversary coming up, it's a great time to talk about traditions and history. &amp;nbsp;On Friday, I upheld one in SPJ that I can't seem to track its origin. The tradition says the the SPJ national president will make his or her first visit to Fort Worth, Texas.&amp;nbsp;Before I left, someone said it&amp;nbsp;goes back 60 years. One Fort Worth member said that Phil Record, who served in 1983-1984, started the annual trip to Fort...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/10/19/21577.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21577" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Minnesota program on RNC arrests</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/14/21461.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21461</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21461.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21461</wfw:commentRss><description>The Minnesota Pro chapter wasted little time arranging a program to talk about what happened between journalists and law enforcement while covering the protests at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul. 
The event is planned for Sept. 22 at the University of Minnesota and features&amp;nbsp;a big-name moderator. Al Tompkins of the Poynter Institute will lead the discussion about journalists and law enforcement officials....(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/14/21461.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21461" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>No clue at QU</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/14/21460.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21460</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21460.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21460</wfw:commentRss><description>At Quinnipiac University in Connecticut, university officials have threatened the student SPJ chapter because its members had the temerity to&amp;nbsp;assist a group of students running a new college news Web site.
The New Haven paper has an account here.
The university has suggested the SPJ chapter would no longer&amp;nbsp;continue as an official school orgnaization because it shared its space at a campus fair with the Web site.
Neil Ralston, SPJ's vice president of campus chapter affiars, is the guy...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/14/21460.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21460" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Finding one's voice</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/11/21449.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21449</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21449.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21449</wfw:commentRss><description>One of the responsbilities of this position is to be the face of the organization. Today, I think I was actually its voice. I spent on hour on a Portsmouth, New Hampshire community radio show called "Portside."&amp;nbsp; The audio runs about an hour and it takes five minutes to get to the interview.
I'm not sure how large the audience was and former New Hampshire state lawmaker turned talk show host &amp;nbsp;Burt Cohen was a friendly questioner. I have now done four interviews about the arrest of jounalists...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/11/21449.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21449" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RNC arrests still top of mind</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/10/21443.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:21443</guid><dc:creator>DaveAeikens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/21443.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21443</wfw:commentRss><description>I have spent part of my day talking to reporters covering the story about the journalists arrested&amp;nbsp; covering the protests at the Republican National Convention. It's a story that continues because the charges are still pending and there are some folks looking into how this was all handled. That's good.
&amp;nbsp;The Minnesota Independent has the best list I have seen so far of the names the the reporters who were swept up in the arrests. This, of course, is unacceptable. We had hoped the police...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/09/10/21443.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21443" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ethical journalism is not lost; let me help you find it</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/05/04/20497.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:20497</guid><dc:creator>ClintBrewer</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/20497.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=20497</wfw:commentRss><description>We’re journalists and we’re here to help you. Trust us.That is essentially the line American media companies have been using since the dawn of television. Each year, however, that message is received with increasing skepticism from news consumers.The studies detailing the American public’s distrust of the media — and of journalists — are too numerous to count. But instead of heeding that warning, many traditional news entities bend to pressing market forces. With each passing year, they blend in...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2008/05/04/20497.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=20497" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shield Law Slam Dunk</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/10/17/8839.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:8839</guid><dc:creator>ClintBrewer</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/8839.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8839</wfw:commentRss><description>What a day. What an amazing day for journalism and democracy.
In a historic, landslide victory, the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007 sailed through the U.S. House of Representatives on a 398 to 21 vote&amp;nbsp;Tuesday, enjoying clear bipartisan support.
It was a long day of political maneuvering and some drama brought on by a move to see the bill sent back to committee. SPJ Communications staff and our attorneys from Baker Hostetler monitored the debate live&amp;nbsp; from the floor and via C-Span...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/10/17/8839.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8839" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1002.aspx">Freedom of Information</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1003.aspx">Federal Shield</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1016.aspx">Media Law</category></item><item><title>Tatum's random thoughts on her way out the door</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/10/07/8744.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:8744</guid><dc:creator>christinetatum</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/8744.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8744</wfw:commentRss><description>If you missed SPJ's 2007 national conference, you missed what very well could be the best wingding this great organization has staged in years. As USA Today Editor Ken Paulson put it Saturday night, "The star power was here in full force."

It was a glorious end to a wonderful year packed -- absolutely packed -- with accomplishment. Very soon, you'll find my annual report on SPJ.org. Please take a look at it because I think you, too, will be mightily impressed with the ground covered since August...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/10/07/8744.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8744" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1008.aspx">SPJ Matters</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1009.aspx">Odds and Ends</category></item><item><title>Shield Law progresses -- and SPJ was there! </title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/10/04/8710.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:8710</guid><dc:creator>christinetatum</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/8710.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8710</wfw:commentRss><description>This morning, a proposed federal shield law that would help journalists protect confidential sources sailed out of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee by a vote of 15-2. 

One of the dissenters: Sen. Jon Kyl, the Arizona Republican SPJ members also known as "Senator Secrecy." The other? Republican Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas.

Some things to note: 

 Several people deserve credit for this important legislation. I have been referring to this Senate version of the shield bill as the Specter...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/10/04/8710.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8710" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1003.aspx">Federal Shield</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1008.aspx">SPJ Matters</category></item><item><title>Come to terms with the trouble we're in</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/09/24/8610.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:8610</guid><dc:creator>christinetatum</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/8610.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8610</wfw:commentRss><description>MarketWatch's John Dvorak's Sept. 22 column is a must-read. It's harsh, but his assessment of the newspaper industry is dead on. These are snippets I particularly appreciate:
"As more newspapers make the mistake of eliminating reporting jobs, they fall into the pit of redundancy with nothing special to offer."
"The only papers or news organizations that can expect to survive will be those with lots of original content available only at their individual sites. The operations that rely more on universally...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/09/24/8610.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8610" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1018.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1070.aspx">The Business Side</category></item><item><title>Free speech, Responsible journalism NOT synonymous</title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/09/24/8605.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:8605</guid><dc:creator>christinetatum</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/8605.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8605</wfw:commentRss><description>I have watched with great interest two controversies spinning in the last week out of college campuses. One is practically in my backyard -- Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colo. -- and the other is at Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, Conn. 

Obviously, different publications, different students and different journalism are involved -- but both conflicts illustrate why I firmly believe that free speech and responsible journalism are not synonymous. I’ll be explaining...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/09/24/8605.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8605" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1007.aspx">On campus</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1010.aspx">J-Ethics</category></item><item><title>Still laughing at FOX lawsuit ... </title><link>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/09/20/8580.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09b0eec0-9b9f-45ed-a018-dbfba5cb4b26:8580</guid><dc:creator>christinetatum</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/comments/8580.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8580</wfw:commentRss><description>The next time you need a video MP3 player to help wile away all those hours you anticipate being stuck in the car, on the train or in the airport, you must download "The First Amendment Project." 
This 2004 production from the Sundance documentary collection (and co-produced by Court TV) is priceless if for no other reason than the 20-minutes-or-so segment titled, "Fox vs. Franken." 
Some quick background: Fox network filed suit against Al Franken after network commentator Bill O'Reilly's angry-looking...(&lt;a href="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/2007/09/20/8580.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www2.spj.org/blog/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8580" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1004.aspx">Corporate shenanigans</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1009.aspx">Odds and Ends</category><category domain="http://www2.spj.org/blog/blogs/president/archive/category/1016.aspx">Media Law</category></item></channel></rss>